For a while there, I was really worried.
I mean, I could see the words, and I knew what a good 80 percent of them meant, but somehow, it wasn't coming together. I put four chapters behind me, and had really only a tenuous grasp of what was going on.
And so I didn't blog. I just didn't have much to say. But I didn't read any further, either -- I didn't want to put too much distance between what I was reading and what I was commenting on.
But I had to say something. I started this thing, and it seems like everyone's waiting on me to pipe up. So this morning on my way to work, I flipped through the first chapter to refresh my memory on the few notes I took. And somehow, instead, I started to read the book again.
And suddenly I got it. I understood what was going on at that breakfast a lot better than I had before. I'm sure there's a lot of nuance I'm missing (heck, I haven't even found translation for the Latin yet), but there are things that completely eluded me on my first go-round. The text was too dense (or I was) for me to realize what Haines is doing in Ireland (he's a Brit writer, working on an "among the natives" type piece about the Irish). It seems to me that Stephen is pissed at him, partially because of jealousy (he's a frustrated writer himself -- he's a schoolteacher that Buck keeps calling "the bard") and partially because of a dislike of the egotism of the whole project and archaeological stance. Which is why he feeds him bullshit facts, like when he mentions they pay rent on the tower "to the secretary of state for war," as he says on page 17 (18).* Somehow, the intent and flow of this opening conversation connected with me this time, when it hadn't before.
At least, I hope I'm getting the intent.
So of our three main characters in this segment, we have Buck Mulligan (stately, plump Buck Mulligan) who's a jovial athiest medical student, happily making light of religion whenever he can. We've got his friend Stephen Dedalus, an unreligious man haunted by his denial of his mother's dying wish -- the he pray with her at the end. He's no happy athiest (or hyperborean, as they call it, if I've got that right); he's has no faith, but it bothers him. And then there's Haines, who's looking to make money off of his travels to Ireland. Buck thinks they can make money (or gain some sort of status) off of Haines's work, and wants Stephen to feed him choice insights (such as the cracked mirror of a servant being "a symbol of Irish art"). Stephen knows that whatever the value of these insights are, he won't reap the rewards if he gives them to Haines.
Meanwhile, they have breakfast, and the corpse of a man who drowned nine days ago still hasn't turned up. And Stephen's upset with Buck for being callous about his mother's death, but being callous is simply what Buck does. He doesn't really know any other way. The threads of conversation wind and twist into the background before springing back into view, and it's hard to follow for that reason. But this second reading really clarified things for me.
Not everything, though. Not hardly. I'll list some of the things that puzzled me in my next post.
Rob
*Okay, it turns out that might not be bullshit after all. Martello towers were part of Ireland's defenses against Napoleonic armies; it's certainly possible that their rent would go to the war department. That feasibility is certainly why Stephen says it, whether it's true or not.
Monday, May 12, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Hey there. I actually wasn't waiting on you, I'm just waiting on my life to calm down a little. I read the first 14 pages or so a couple of weeks ago and quickly realized this is not the kind of book you can read just a couple pages at a time (I don't think). Anyway, we're supposed to be going away for the long weekend next week and so I'm hoping to dive into it then. So basically, I'll catch up. : )
Hiya again Rob
You're coming over all Irish these days I must say!
That's a good reading of the first section of the book.
The fact that Haines is English probably was a sore point for Stephen. Joyce seems to have had nothing but contempt for simple Nationalism, but parts of the book are an expression of sadness about Ireland's occupied state.
eg The later parts of the book are about a man wandering the streets of Dublin trying to seem as if everything is ok when in fact another man is not just in his house, but actually in bed with his wife! There's a metaphor for you!
Good luck with the rest of the book. Its an enjoyable read, if a challenging one. I think being a bit older helps in understanding it too. There's loads of stuff in it that I just couldn't understand when I was in college. You need to have lived a little!
Post a Comment